Maths Olympiad Prep

Track / Stage 7 / 234 of 300 #1634 of 1964

Problem 1634

National Olympiad second round; IMO P1/P4
Geometry Difficulty 7.4 Prove it

Let ABCDEA B C D E be a convex pentagon with CD=DEC D=D E and ∠EDC≠2⋅∠ADB\angle E D C \neq 2 \cdot \angle A D B. Suppose that a point PP is located in the interior of the pentagon such that AP=AEA P=A E and BP=BCB P=B C. Prove that PP lies on the diagonal CEC E if and only if area⁡(BCD)+area⁡(ADE)=\operatorname{area}(B C D)+\operatorname{area}(A D E)= area⁡(ABD)+area⁡(ABP)\operatorname{area}(A B D)+\operatorname{area}(A B P). (Hungary)

This one wants a proof. Work it on paper, then read the official solution and mark yourself. Be honest about it: the record is only any use to you if it is.

Next problem →

Official solution

Let P′P^{\prime} be the reflection of PP across line ABA B, and let MM and NN be the midpoints of P′EP^{\prime} E and P′CP^{\prime} C respectively. Convexity ensures that P′P^{\prime} is distinct from both EE and CC, and hence from both MM and NN. We claim that both the area condition and the collinearity condition in the problem are equivalent to the condition that the (possibly degenerate) right-angled triangles AP′MA P^{\prime} M and BP′NB P^{\prime} N are directly similar (equivalently, AP′EA P^{\prime} E and BP′CB P^{\prime} C are directly similar). ! For the equivalence with the collinearity condition, let FF denote the foot of the perpendicular from P′P^{\prime} to ABA B, so that FF is the midpoint of PP′P P^{\prime}. We have that PP lies on CEC E if and only if FF lies on MNM N, which occurs if and only if we have the equality ∠AFM=∠BFN\angle A F M=\angle B F N of signed angles modulo π\pi. By concyclicity of AP′FMA P^{\prime} F M and BFP′NB F P^{\prime} N, this is equivalent to ∠AP′M=∠BP′N\angle A P^{\prime} M=\angle B P^{\prime} N, which occurs if and only if AP′MA P^{\prime} M and BP′NB P^{\prime} N are directly similar. ! For the other equivalence with the area condition, we have the equality of signed areas area⁡(ABD)+area⁡(ABP)=area⁡(AP′BD)=area⁡(AP′D)+area⁡(BDP′)\operatorname{area}(A B D)+\operatorname{area}(A B P)=\operatorname{area}\left(A P^{\prime} B D\right)=\operatorname{area}\left(A P^{\prime} D\right)+\operatorname{area}\left(B D P^{\prime}\right). Using the identity area⁡(ADE)−area⁡(AP′D)=area⁡(ADE)+area⁡(ADP′)=2\operatorname{area}(A D E)-\operatorname{area}\left(A P^{\prime} D\right)=\operatorname{area}(A D E)+\operatorname{area}\left(A D P^{\prime}\right)=2 area (ADM)(A D M), and similarly for BB, we find that the area condition is equivalent to the equality area⁡(DAM)=area⁡(DBN). \operatorname{area}(D A M)=\operatorname{area}(D B N) . Now note that AA and BB lie on the perpendicular bisectors of P′EP^{\prime} E and P′CP^{\prime} C, respectively. If we write GG and HH for the feet of the perpendiculars from DD to these perpendicular bisectors respectively, then this area condition can be rewritten as MA⋅GD=NB⋅HD M A \cdot G D=N B \cdot H D (In this condition, we interpret all lengths as signed lengths according to suitable conventions: for instance, we orient P′EP^{\prime} E from P′P^{\prime} to EE, orient the parallel line DHD H in the same direction, and orient the perpendicular bisector of P′EP^{\prime} E at an angle π/2\pi / 2 clockwise from the oriented segment P′EP^{\prime} E - we adopt the analogous conventions at BB.) ! To relate the signed lengths GDG D and HDH D to the triangles AP′MA P^{\prime} M and BP′NB P^{\prime} N, we use the following calculation. Claim. Let Γ\Gamma denote the circle centred on DD with both EE and CC on the circumference, and hh the power of P′P^{\prime} with respect to Γ\Gamma. Then we have the equality GD⋅P′M=HD⋅P′N=14h≠0. G D \cdot P^{\prime} M=H D \cdot P^{\prime} N=\frac{1}{4} h \neq 0 . Proof. Firstly, we have h≠0h \neq 0, since otherwise P′P^{\prime} would lie on Γ\Gamma, and hence the internal angle bisectors of ∠EDP′\angle E D P^{\prime} and ∠P′DC\angle P^{\prime} D C would pass through AA and BB respectively. This would violate the angle inequality ∠EDC≠2⋅∠ADB\angle E D C \neq 2 \cdot \angle A D B given in the question. Next, let E′E^{\prime} denote the second point of intersection of P′EP^{\prime} E with Γ\Gamma, and let E′′E^{\prime \prime} denote the point on Γ\Gamma diametrically opposite E′E^{\prime}, so that E′′EE^{\prime \prime} E is perpendicular to P′EP^{\prime} E. The point GG lies on the perpendicular bisectors of the sides P′EP^{\prime} E and EE′′E E^{\prime \prime} of the right-angled triangle P′EE′′P^{\prime} E E^{\prime \prime}; it follows that GG is the midpoint of P′E′′P^{\prime} E^{\prime \prime}. Since DD is the midpoint of E′E′′E^{\prime} E^{\prime \prime}, we have that GD=12P′E′G D=\frac{1}{2} P^{\prime} E^{\prime}. Since P′M=12P′EP^{\prime} M=\frac{1}{2} P^{\prime} E, we have GD⋅P′M=14P′E′⋅P′E=14hG D \cdot P^{\prime} M=\frac{1}{4} P^{\prime} E^{\prime} \cdot P^{\prime} E=\frac{1}{4} h. The other equality HD⋅P′NH D \cdot P^{\prime} N follows by exactly the same argument. ! From this claim, we see that the area condition is equivalent to the equality (MA:P′M)=(NB:P′N) \left(M A: P^{\prime} M\right)=\left(N B: P^{\prime} N\right) of ratios of signed lengths, which is equivalent to direct similarity of AP′MA P^{\prime} M and BP′NB P^{\prime} N, as desired.

Source: NuminaMath-1.5, licensed Apache-2.0. Statement reproduced verbatim; metadata (topic, difficulty, ordering) added by this project.